ArticleEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2026
Dentists' experience of providing treatment for children with intellectual disabilities: a focus group analysis in France.
Article in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChildren with intellectual disabilities often have unmet oral health needs. Challenging behaviours during dental procedures create uncertainty for dentists about the appropriate approach to adopt. Tailored strategies, including cognitive-behavioural approaches, sedation, or physical restraint, are often required.
aimTo explore the experiences and perceptions of dentists treating children with intellectual disabilities, including the use of pharmacological or physical restraint and any ethical dilemmas involved.
designFour focus groups of French dentists (overall n = 20) with experience of treating children with intellectual disabilities were assembled and discussions undertaken. Thematic content analysis identified the underlying themes.
resultsParticipants described the characteristics of their practice, the difficulties and rewards they encountered, and their motivation in working with this population. They described the different strategies used to overcome challenging behaviours. Participants demonstrated a commitment to care, prioritising beneficence over autonomy in difficult situations, but were aware of compromising on ideals in these situations.
conclusionThis study describes the complexity of dental care for children with intellectual disabilities. The ethical tensions surrounding the use of restraint and pharmacological techniques were significant, as these practices conflict with the principle of autonomy. This moral complexity highlights the need for deeper understanding and discussion regarding the ethical implications of dental care in such contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41620504What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.