ArticleScientific reports2026
Cybersickness-induced EEG responses in curved monitor and head-mounted display.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cybersickness is a common issue in virtual reality (VR), yet addressing it remains challenging due to the lack of quantitative evaluation methods. To quantitatively assess cybersickness, this study examined electroencephalography (EEG) changes and Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) scores using two different display types: a curved monitor and a head-mounted display (HMD). Thirty-one male participants (25.0 ± 1.9 years old) were exposed to cybersickness-inducing VR content developed using the Unity engine, featuring pitch, yaw, and roll rotations.The results revealed two key findings. First, regarding cybersickness induction, both display conditions showed significant increases in Delta power and decreases in Alpha power compared to the baseline, thus validating the effectiveness of the stimulus. Second, in the direct comparison between the two displays, no statistically significant differences were found in EEG spectral power. However, SSQ scores showed significantly higher Disorientation in the HMD condition. Furthermore, no linear correlation was observed between EEG and SSQ scores.In conclusion, these findings suggest that although both displays trigger similar physiological responses associated with sensory conflict processing (EEG), the immersive HMD environment induces greater vestibular disorientation (SSQ). This implies that a curved monitor may be a viable alternative for studying the physiological correlates of cybersickness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.