ArticleScientific reports2026
Mechanical and durability performance of optimized geopolymer concrete with manufactured artificial aggregates using a tailored mix design method.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this research, a novel mix design method is developed for geopolymer concrete integrating artificial aggregates. The artificial coarse aggregates are manufactured in the laboratory using a newly developed cut-blade mechanism, and the fine aggregates are produced from construction and demolition waste. The materials used to create the geopolymer concrete primarily include fly ash, glass powder, and construction & demolition waste, along with an alkali activator solution. The mix is optimized using response surface methodology to achieve the best performance at an economical cost. The optimized mix, with an alkali activator solution–to–fly ash ratio of 0.6, achieved maximum compressive and flexural strengths of 44 MPa and 5.2 MPa, respectively. The results show that adding glass powder to the mix can improve the durability of the concrete, as reflected by UPV values of 4200 m/s in water and 3900 m/s under sulfuric acid exposure. Highly accurate predictive models (R² > 0.99) were developed using Response Surface Methodology. The limited formation of crystalline phases in the ITZ suggests that the artificial aggregates do not disrupt the geopolymer matrix structure. These microstructural findings validate the reliability of the ITZ in geopolymer concrete with artificial aggregates, supporting its mechanical performance. In general, the results indicate that the proposed mix design is a sustainable and high-performance which is alternative to traditional concrete.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.