Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41620451›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Risk factor identification for large scale amusement facilities using mixture of experts and fusion of multiple models.

Suli Hao, Lijia Xing, Mairui Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Suli HaoFaculty of Management, China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), Beijing, 100083, China.
Lijia XingFaculty of Management, China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), Beijing, 100083, China.
Mairui ZhangFaculty of Management, China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), Beijing, 100083, China. mairuizhang1005@163.com.

Funding

the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (General Program) 9252014the National Key Research and Development Plan of the 14th Five-Year Plan 2022YFF0607401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The safety of large-scale amusement facilities is an important part of public safety. Their operational risks are sudden and diverse, and efficient and accurate text recognition and analysis methods are urgently needed to support risk warning and intelligent supervision. In view of the problems of low recognition efficiency and poor adaptability of traditional methods, this paper proposes a risk text recognition model of MoE + Stacking multi-perspective fusion, which combines semantic embedding and keyword feature construction, and integrates clustering, graph modeling and multi-model integration strategies to achieve structured modeling and accurate recognition of amusement facility risk information. The results show that the MoE + Stacking model is significantly better than a single model in multiple indicators. The accuracy, precision, recall and F1 value are increased by 3.44, 3.50, 3.33 and 2.90 percentage points respectively compared with the original Stacking model, and the LogLoss is reduced by 0.41%, showing a stronger risk identification ability. The research results provide effective technical support for public safety text analysis and intelligent supervision of special equipment, and have good generalization and promotion value.

Indexed as

Amusement RiskBAAI General EmbeddingK-means clusteringMixture of ExpertsStacking

Identifiers

PMID41620451
PMCPMC12916918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.