ArticleScientific reports2026
A genetic algorithm-based ensemble framework for wind speed forecasting.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wind energy has gained significant attention as a clean, renewable resource due to fossil fuels' environmental impact. Accurate wind speed forecasting is essential to address variability and intermittency challenges. Current forecasting difficulties arise from wind speed's high susceptibility to meteorological conditions. This study proposes a GA-based ensemble framework that combines forecasting models using genetic algorithms. We systematically compared 14 models: linear models (AR, ARMA), advanced neural networks (MLP, RBF), hybrid models, and ensembles. Models were evaluated using minute-by-minute data from five major Brazilian cities: Brasília, Florianópolis, Petrolina, Natal, and São Luís. Key findings include: I) Superior Performance: The proposed framework achieved MSE values from 0.0802 to 0.9020 and MAE values from 0.1970 to 0.6140 across all datasets; II) Robust Prediction:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.