Trial reportTranslational psychiatry2026
Randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot trial of theta-band transcranial alternating current stimulation during cognitive training in mild Alzheimer's disease.
Trial report in Translational psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of transcranial alternating current stimulation on cognitive function in patients with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive deficits are a hallmark of Alzheimer's disease (AD), and effective treatments remain elusive. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), a non-invasive technique, has shown potential in improving cognitive function across various populations, but further research is needed to investigate its efficacy in AD. In a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot trial, 36 mild AD patients received active or sham theta-tACS (8 Hz, 1.6 mA, 20-min daily) during n-back task for two weeks, followed by a 10-week follow-up. Cognitive assessments and resting-state EEG were analyzed at baseline, after-treatment, and follow-up. The results showed that the active group demonstrated significant cognitive improvements after treatment (MMSE: t (15) =-3.273, p = 0.005, Cohen's d = 0.82), particularly in short-term memory (MMSE-recall: Z = -2.11, p = 0.035, r = 0.53), with maintained benefits after 10 weeks. In contrast, the sham group exhibited long-term cognitive decline (MMSE: t (4) = 3.586, p = 0.023, Cohen's d = -1.60). EEG analysis revealed reduced gamma power (t (23) = 2.689, p = 0.013, Cohen's d = 1.077) and theta connectivity in active group, particularly in the frontotemporal regions (F4/F7: t (23) = 2.467, p = 0.021, Cohen's d = 0.988; F4/T3: t (23) = 2.465, p = 0.022, Cohen's d = 0.987), which was correlated with cognitive improvements (R = -0.57, p = 0.043). In conclusion, tACS combining cognitive training may offer cognitive benefits in mild AD by modulating neural activity, though further studies are needed to clarify its mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.