ArticleClinical and translational allergy2026
Real-World Effectiveness of Mepolizumab in Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps: Findings From the European CRS Outcome Registry (CHRINOSOR).
Article in Clinical and translational allergy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-world impact of mepolizumab on symptom control and health utility in severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: the RINOSUR 2.0 multicenter cohort study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Real-World Effectiveness of Mepolizumab in Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps: Findings From the European CRS Outcome Registry (CHRINOSOR).Clinical and translational allergy · 2026Article
- Severe Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: From IL-5-Driven Pathogenetic Mechanisms to Clinical Management in the Italian Clinical Setting.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe SYNAPSE phase 3 study demonstrated that mepolizumab significantly improves nasal polyp score (NPS), quality of life and symptom severity in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).
objectiveWe aimed to evaluate mepolizumab effectiveness in a real-world cohort from 12 tertiary centers in 6 European countries. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective analysis was conducted in 110 CRSwNP patients (comorbid asthma: 86.4%). CRS-related outcomes were analyzed at baseline, 24 and 52 weeks of mepolizumab. Treatment response was evaluated based on EUFOREA 2021 criteria.
resultsSignificant improvements in NPS, Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22), and visual analog scale (VAS) symptom scores were observed at 24 and 52 weeks compared to baseline. Further improvement between weeks 24 and 52 was observed for NPS and SNOT-22. Asthma Control Test (ACT) also improved significantly by week 24 (ACT score ≥ 20: 64.5%). At least one response criterion (change in SNOT-22 ≥ 8.9, NPS ≥ 1, VAS total sinus symptoms ≥ 20, VAS nasal blockage ≥ 20, VAS loss of smell ≥ 20) was met by 85.6% and 78.7% of patients at 24 and 52 weeks, respectively. A more stringent composite response (SNOT-22 < 30, NPS < 4, VAS total sinus symptoms < 50, and VAS nasal blockage < 50) was achieved in 18.3% and 44.6% of patients at 24 and 52 weeks, respectively.
conclusionMepolizumab demonstrated clinically meaningful benefits in a real-world CRSwNP population, with nearly half of patients achieving a beneficial composite treatment response by week 52. Notably, progressive improvements between weeks 24 and 52 underscore the value of prolonged therapy and the importance of evaluating treatment response at one year.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.