Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41619935›Full record

ArticleThe ocular surface2026

Lacrimal gland duct obstruction and dacryops: Unravelling its pathogenesis with proteomics and cellular profiling.

Swati Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ocular surface, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Swati SinghHariram Motumal Nasta & Renu Hariram Nasta Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery Services, KAR Campus, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India; Prof. Krothapalli Ravindranath Ophthalmic Research Biorepository, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. Electronic address: swatisingh@lvpei.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo understand the pathogenesis of the main lacrimal gland dacryops (ductular cyst) using proteomics and cellular profiling.

methodsFour patients (mean age, 42.2 ± 18.4 years) with dacryops underwent cyst excision following the aspiration of the cyst contents. Cyst contents were processed using mass spectrometry and compared with eight healthy tear samples. The cyst wall was processed for histology (H&E, Masson trichrome), epithelial (Aquaporin 5, CK15, CK19), stromal (Vimentin), neural (beta-III tubulin, NCAM), and immune cell markers (CD3, CD20, CD138, myeloperoxidase, CD68).

resultsThe cyst lining was cuboidal to squamous in three cases (CK19+, ductal origin), and exhibited goblet cell metaplasia in one case. Compared to normal ducts, the dacryops cyst wall lacked expression of AQP5 and beta-III tubulin. Subepithelial fibrosis and strong vimentin positivity were observed in all specimens, along with mild to moderate inflammation. Infiltrating immune cells were CD20

conclusionDacryops involves reactive ductular ectasia secondary to inflammation, resulting in increased MMPs, fibrosis, and loss of the periductal neural network. The cyst fluid is rich in apolipoproteins, immunoglobulins, and complement factors. Future research could focus on the lipidomics of the cyst fluid.

Indexed as

CystsLacrimal ApparatusLacrimal Apparatus DiseasesProteomicsAdultBiomarkersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTearsBiomarkersDacryopsDuctLacrimal glandProteomicsTears

Identifiers

PMID41619935
PMCPMC7619048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.