Observational studyThe Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation2026
Donor-derived cell-free DNA associated with increased risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction and mortality: Are absolute levels better than percentage?
Observational study in The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02423070 (Genome Transplant Dynamics), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Genome Transplant Dynamics
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Apparentness of Unseen Rejection Episodes Post Lung rLTx Is Reliably Enabled by ddcfDNA Detection.HLA · 2026Article
- Utility of donor-derived cell-free DNA testing after lung transplantation in the precision medicine era.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2026Review
- Donor-derived cell-free DNA testing for noninvasive monitoring of allograft rejection after lung transplantation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is a need for reliable methods to risk-stratify patients for chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) and death. A proof-of-concept study reported the predictive utility of early post-transplant levels of percent donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA), a measure affected by host cell-free DNA changes. This study assesses the predictive utility of dd-cfDNA in and beyond the early post-transplant period using absolute dd-cfDNA, a measure not affected by host cell-free DNA changes.
methodsThis multicenter study (Genome Research Alliance for Transplantation, NCT02423070) of lung transplant patients measured serial absolute dd-cfDNA in copies/ml and percent dd-cfDNA. We performed multivariable Cox regression analyses to determine the association between dd-cfDNA and the composite outcome of moderate-to-severe CLAD and/or death; the early post-transplant model used mean dd-cfDNA levels within days 30 to 91. A time-dependent model used dd-cfDNA values beyond the early post-transplant period.
resultsThe cohort included 242 patients and 2,838 serial dd-cfDNA assessments. Absolute dd-cfDNA had similar or better performance than percent dd-cfDNA to risk-stratify patients for moderate-to-severe CLAD/death. High absolute dd-cfDNA levels in the early post-transplant period (hazard ratio 1.29, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.60, p = 0.018) or at any time post-transplant (hazard ratio 1.51, 95% confidence interval 1.32-1.73, p < 0.001) were associated with an increased risk of moderate-to-severe CLAD/death, and absolute dd-cfDNA levels >250 copies/ml were associated with an elevated risk of moderate-to-severe CLAD/death.
conclusionsThe study reports dd-cfDNA risk assessment models for moderate-to-severe CLAD/death; absolute values showed similar or better predictive performance than percent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.