Trial reportJNCI cancer spectrum2026
Feasibility evaluation of a virtual lifestyle intervention for early-stage breast cancer survivors undergoing chemotherapy.
Trial report in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWeight gain and physical inactivity during chemotherapy for patients with early-stage breast cancer are common. We sought to investigate the feasibility of a virtual lifestyle (exercise and diet) intervention for breast cancer survivors during chemotherapy.
methodsThis single-arm phase 2 trial delivered 12 weekly 1-hour telehealth sessions of supervised exercise and diet education to breast cancer survivors (patients with stage I-III disease) starting neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Screening, recruitment, intervention, and study assessments completed at baseline (T0), immediately after the intervention (T1), and 3 months after the intervention (T2) were conducted by telehealth in 2022-2023. The primary outcome was that at least 60% of participants achieved 50% of the predetermined exercise and dietary goals. Secondary outcomes were acceptability (participation, attendance, completion), physical health, and lifestyle outcomes.
resultsOf 73 referrals, 60 individuals were eligible, 58 (97%) provided consent, 51 (85%) commenced the intervention, and 34 (57%) completed at least 1 postintervention assessment (completion rate = 67%). The mean (SD) age of participants was 51 (8.8) years, and 50% of participants were receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Attendance was lower for exercise than for diet sessions (44% vs 62% attended ≥75% sessions). At T1, 36% of participants adhered to at at least 50% of the preset goals, improving at T2 (62.5%). Weight was not statistically significantly different between T0 and T1 (P = .199) but increased substantially at T2 (P = .018). Average waist circumference was reduced at T1 (‒1.9 cm, P = .014) and at T2 (‒3.3 cm, P < .001). Weekly exercise time increased by 38.5 minutes from T0 to T1 (P = .038), and the proportion of participants who met exercise guidelines improved from 6% (T0) to 41% (T2).
conclusionOur primary outcome was not achieved immediately after the intervention but was observed 3 months later. Individuals completing the intervention attended at least half the diet and exercise sessions during chemotherapy. Results of this study will inform design of a phase 3 study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.