ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2026
Analysis of Pulsatile Vessel Expansion in Healthy, COPD- and PH-Patients Using Dynamic Vessel Segmentation in Free-Breathing Lung MRI.
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe pulsatile expansion of pulmonary vessels carries dynamic cardiopulmonary information that may reveal disease earlier than structural changes alone. PURPOSE: To test (i) intra- and inter-scan repeatability of dynamic vessel metrics in healthy subjects, and (ii) whether chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and postcapillary pulmonary hypertension (PH) exhibit disease-specific differences. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective, multi-cohort feasibility study with repeatability sub-study. SUBJECTS: Healthy: 29 (11 female), COPD: 52 (15 female), PH: 25 (15 female) with isolated postcapillary PH. FIELDSTRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5T, free-breathing spoiled gradient-echo sequence, TE = 0.82 ms, TR = 3 ms, flip angle = 5°. ASSESSMENT: 2D U-Nets segmented pulmonary vessels throughout each series of 250 images. Dynamic metrics included the coefficient of variation (CV) of vessel area and CV of vessel signal. Delay between vessel signal and vessel expansion as %-of-RR-interval (SE-delay) together with the heart rate and lung area were calculated. STATISTICAL TESTS: Repeatability: Friedman; intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); standard error of measurement (SEM) and the minimal detectable change (MDC). Group comparisons: Kruskal-Wallis and multiple linear regression. p < 0.05 was considered significant.
resultsOnly the heart rate and the SE-delay presented significant changes across repetitive scans. Differences in Bland-Altman plots were evenly distributed across the range of measurements and symmetrically scattered around zero within 95% confidence intervals (mean bias 0.08%-5.12%). Across cohorts, CV vessel area and CV lung area differed significantly, showing lowest variability in COPD (2.67%; 7.03%) and highest in PH (4.58%; 16.74%). SE-delay was significantly prolonged in COPD (81.98%) compared to PH (67.20%) and healthy participants (62.97%). Cohort status (Healthy/COPD/PH) remained the strongest significant predictor for all parameters after adjustment (F-values 4.62-34.04), while age and gender had no significant influence (p > 0.391; p > 0.069). DATA
conclusionFree-breathing lung MRI with automated vessel segmentation reveals distinct hemodynamic characteristics in COPD and PH. This method shows potential as a sensitive non-invasive tool for detection, phenotyping, and treatment monitoring in pulmonary pathology. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 3. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: 2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.