Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41619305›Full record

ReviewChemistry & biodiversity2026

Topical Formulations Containing Mentha piperita for Wound Healing: A Scoping Review.

Lorena Gonçalves Araújo, Beatriz Gomes Vila-Nova, Afonso Gomes Abreu

Abstract readScoping ReviewReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemistry & biodiversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lorena Gonçalves AraújoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, Brazil.
Beatriz Gomes Vila-NovaLaboratório de Imunofisiologia, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, Brazil.
Afonso Gomes AbreuPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1665-0879

Funding

Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel Finance Code 001National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 307035/2022-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin wound infections represent a major clinical challenge, exacerbated by biofilm formation and the increasing prevalence of bacterial resistance. Essential oils, particularly those of Mentha piperita, are well recognized for their antimicrobial and wound-healing properties. This scoping review mapped the available evidence on the use of topical formulations containing M. piperita-derived products for wound healing, with a focus on formulation vehicles, concentrations, experimental models, and efficacy parameters. Following JBI and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and LILACS (2010-2025). Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria, the majority of which were preclinical, comprising in vitro (35%), in vivo (30%), and combined in vitro/in vivo (30%) models. Only one ex vivo study was identified, and no clinical trials were found. The formulations investigated ranged from creams and gels to nanoemulsions, lipid carriers, films, and nanofibers, with concentrations varying from 0.5% to 20%. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently tested strain and showed greater susceptibility to peppermint essential oil (PEO). Incorporation into nanostructured systems was associated with improved stability, enhanced skin permeation, and superior antimicrobial performance, particularly when combined with nanoparticles, metals, other bioactive compounds, or, in specific cases, clinical antibiotics such as levofloxacin. Across both infected wound models and noninfected wound-healing models, M. piperita-containing formulations were associated with favorable outcomes, although the underlying mechanisms differed depending on the presence or absence of microbial challenge. Despite these promising findings, significant gaps remain regarding ex vivo validation, safety assessment, and clinical translation. Overall, PEO demonstrates considerable potential as an antimicrobial and wound-healing agent; however, more standardized and clinically oriented studies are required.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsMentha piperitaOils, VolatileWound HealingAdministration, TopicalAnimalsDrug CompoundingHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPlant OilsStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsOils, Volatilepeppermint oilPlant Oilsantimicrobial activitybiofilm inhibitionMentha piperitananostructured systems

Identifiers

PMID41619305
PMCPMC12860549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.