Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41619297›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2026

Machine learning model for fast prediction and uncertainty quantification of needle deflection during prostate biopsy.

Nathan Hoffman, Lidia Al-Zogbi, Axel Krieger, Junichi Tokuda, Pedro Moreira, Mark Fuge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nathan HoffmanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Lidia Al-ZogbiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Axel KriegerDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Junichi TokudaDepartment of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Pedro MoreiraDepartment of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Mark FugeDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.

Funding

TRD 3 - Enabling Technologies for Intraprocedural GuidanceP41EB028741 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Nobuhiko Hata, CLARE M TEMPANY · 2021 to 2026
$10.7M
Open Software Platform for Data-Driven Image-Guided Robotic InterventionsR01EB020667 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI DIAZ-MERCADO, YANCY, KRIEGER, AXEL · 2015 to 2024
$4.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB028741NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020667NIH HHS P41EB028741NIH HHS R01EB020667
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate needle placement is essential for prostate biopsy. Recently, transperineal prostate biopsies are receiving renewed interest due to concern over infection from conventional transrectal biopsies. However, accurate needle placement is more challenging in the transperineal approach than in the transrectal approach due to the long insertion distance leading to a large targeting error and repeated insertion attempts. Improved procedure planning tools that can predict the deviation of the needle can potentially reduce the targeting error and number of insertion attempts. Prediction of deflection magnitude requires a model of biopsy needle deflection, which in turn requires information about tissue material properties. However, material properties of tissue in patients cannot be easily obtained. Accounting for this uncertainty in patient tissue properties requires a model capable of quantifying uncertainty in needle deflection as a function of a distribution of tissue properties. A Monte Carlo uncertainty quantification requires 1000s of samples, but it is not possible to obtain this many samples in a short enough time for intraoperative procedure planning using published needle deflection prediction models. PURPOSE: This work seeks to develop a model of needle deflection fast enough for use in intraoperative procedure planning, validate this model against experimental results, and integrate it into a Monte Carlo uncertainty quantification model.

methodsThis work used a mechanics-based model of biopsy needle deflection to train a Fourier feature neural network (FFNN) model in order to make predictions with a low computational cost. Both models were validated against experimental data. The neural network model was used in a Monte Carlo uncertainty quantification model to quantify uncertainty in needle deflection arising from uncertain tissue mechanical properties.

resultsThis work (1) implemented a mechanics-based model and a FFNN model. Both models were validated against previously published experiments carried out with tissue phantoms. Both models showed close agreement with the experimental data. (2) We showed that our FFNN model was more accurate than a baseline ordinary least squares model, introducing only about 0.3-mm tip deflection error compared to the mechanics-based model. We also showed that our FFNN model makes unbiased predictions with respect to the amount of deflection. (3) We demonstrated a Monte Carlo uncertainty quantification model of needle deflection with a low computational cost of about 20 CPU s. We used our uncertainty quantification model to show how the depth, stiffness, and magnitude of uncertainty in a layer of tissue affect needle deflection. In addition, we showed a simple clinical example of the use of our model.

conclusionsThis work demonstrates a Monte Carlo uncertainty quantification model of needle deflection with a low computational cost. This method shows promise for future applications in procedure planning for prostate biopsies as well as other transperineal procedures conducted with flexible needles such as cryoablation and brachytherapy.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMechanical PhenomenaNeedlesProstateBiopsy, NeedleHumansMaleMonte Carlo MethodPredictive Learning ModelsProstatic NeoplasmsTime FactorsUncertaintyMachine LearningMechanics Based ModelNeedle DeflectionProstate BiopsyUncertainty Quantification

Identifiers

PMID41619297
PMCPMC12860539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.