ArticleMedical physics2026
Machine learning model for fast prediction and uncertainty quantification of needle deflection during prostate biopsy.
Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dose control in robot-assisted seed brachytherapy: challenges, current status, and future directions.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Machine learning model for fast prediction and uncertainty quantification of needle deflection during prostate biopsy.Medical physics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate needle placement is essential for prostate biopsy. Recently, transperineal prostate biopsies are receiving renewed interest due to concern over infection from conventional transrectal biopsies. However, accurate needle placement is more challenging in the transperineal approach than in the transrectal approach due to the long insertion distance leading to a large targeting error and repeated insertion attempts. Improved procedure planning tools that can predict the deviation of the needle can potentially reduce the targeting error and number of insertion attempts. Prediction of deflection magnitude requires a model of biopsy needle deflection, which in turn requires information about tissue material properties. However, material properties of tissue in patients cannot be easily obtained. Accounting for this uncertainty in patient tissue properties requires a model capable of quantifying uncertainty in needle deflection as a function of a distribution of tissue properties. A Monte Carlo uncertainty quantification requires 1000s of samples, but it is not possible to obtain this many samples in a short enough time for intraoperative procedure planning using published needle deflection prediction models. PURPOSE: This work seeks to develop a model of needle deflection fast enough for use in intraoperative procedure planning, validate this model against experimental results, and integrate it into a Monte Carlo uncertainty quantification model.
methodsThis work used a mechanics-based model of biopsy needle deflection to train a Fourier feature neural network (FFNN) model in order to make predictions with a low computational cost. Both models were validated against experimental data. The neural network model was used in a Monte Carlo uncertainty quantification model to quantify uncertainty in needle deflection arising from uncertain tissue mechanical properties.
resultsThis work (1) implemented a mechanics-based model and a FFNN model. Both models were validated against previously published experiments carried out with tissue phantoms. Both models showed close agreement with the experimental data. (2) We showed that our FFNN model was more accurate than a baseline ordinary least squares model, introducing only about 0.3-mm tip deflection error compared to the mechanics-based model. We also showed that our FFNN model makes unbiased predictions with respect to the amount of deflection. (3) We demonstrated a Monte Carlo uncertainty quantification model of needle deflection with a low computational cost of about 20 CPU s. We used our uncertainty quantification model to show how the depth, stiffness, and magnitude of uncertainty in a layer of tissue affect needle deflection. In addition, we showed a simple clinical example of the use of our model.
conclusionsThis work demonstrates a Monte Carlo uncertainty quantification model of needle deflection with a low computational cost. This method shows promise for future applications in procedure planning for prostate biopsies as well as other transperineal procedures conducted with flexible needles such as cryoablation and brachytherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.