ArticleMedical physics2026
Development and dosimetric evaluation of a freely deformable
Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and dosimetric evaluation of a freely deformableMedical physics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBoron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) enables selective tumor irradiation by exploiting the high-linear energy transfer particles generated from neutron interactions with PURPOSE: To develop a freely deformable LiF-polyethylene neutron shield and assess its impact on neutron/gamma attenuation and clinical organ at-risk sparing in head and neck BNCT.
methodsA freely deformable neutron shielding device was constructed using polyethylene beads loaded with lithium fluoride encapsulated in a vacuum-sealed cushion. Neutron and gamma-ray attenuation were measured in a water phantom under clinical conditions using an accelerator-based BNCT system (NeuCure®, Kansai BNCT Medical Center). Measurements were compared with a solid LiF-polyethylene block and validated through Monte Carlo-based simulations in a commercial treatment planning system. Three representative head and neck cases were further simulated to assess clinical dosimetric effects.
resultsThe deformable shielding device reduced the thermal neutron flux by approximately 50%, compared with 60% for the solid LiF-polyethylene block. Simulated head and neck treatments demonstrated significant OAR dose reductions (up to 46.6% in pharyngeal mucosa D
conclusionsThe freely deformable LiF-based neutron shielding device effectively attenuated stray neutron dose while maintaining target coverage in BNCT. Its adaptability and reusability make it a practical adjunct for patient-specific dose optimization in clinical BNCT applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.