ReviewNano convergence2026
AI-driven quantitative review of mobility-stability trade-off in oxide semiconductors.
Review in Nano convergence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Oxide semiconductors have emerged as critical channel materials for advanced display and next-generation memory technologies, offering superior electron mobility, excellent uniformity, and low-temperature processability. Despite successful commercialization in display backplanes since 2012, their broader adoption remains limited by an inherent trade-off between carrier mobility and device stability—a fundamental challenge arising from the complex interplay between conduction band dispersion and defect chemistry. The development of strategies to overcome this trade-off has therefore become essential for realizing high-performance oxide semiconductor devices in emerging applications. In this review, a comprehensive data-driven analysis of the mobility-stability trade-off in oxide semiconductor thin-film transistors is presented through large language model-powered extraction of over 1,000 experimental datasets from literature. First, the methodology for systematic data extraction and the quantitative visualization of the mobility-stability relationship are introduced. Then, the critical roles of channel composition, gate insulator selection, and post-deposition annealing temperature in determining device performance are statistically analyzed through kernel density estimation and correlation studies. Next, the temporal evolution of process technologies from 2003 to 2025 is examined, revealing progressive improvements in both mobility and stability through advanced strategies. Afterward, detailed case studies of outlier devices—those successfully transcending the conventional trade-off—are presented, identifying key breakthrough approaches including multi-channel architectures, crystallinity engineering, hybrid gate dielectrics, and interface optimization. The superior performance of atomic layer deposition compared to physical vapor deposition methods is demonstrated through comparative analysis. Finally, the implications of this data-driven framework for accelerating materials development are discussed, and future perspectives on leveraging AI-assisted analysis for semiconductor research are provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.