Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41619152›Full record

ArticleDrugs2026

The Potential of Authorised Drugs to be Repurposed for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis: A Scoping Review of Clinical Studies.

Michelle W J Heijman, Merel Hartog, Cornelia H M van den Ende, Calin D Popa, Bart J F van den Bemt

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michelle W J Heijman *Department of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. m.heijman@maartenskliniek.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2148-7375
Merel Hartog *Department of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Cornelia H M van den EndeDepartment of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Calin D PopaDepartment of Rheumatology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Bart J F van den BemtDepartment of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND 

objectivesDrug repurposing offers a low-cost and time-efficient approach to discover an effective and safe disease-modifying treatment for osteoarthritis. Although numerous studies have investigated candidate drugs for repurposing, existing narrative reviews are restricted in scope. This scoping review aims to provide an exhaustive overview of the extent and characteristics of clinical research on authorised drugs investigated for treating osteoarthritis.

methodsElectronic database searches were performed from inception until July 2025 in MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane. Authorised drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, European Medicines Agency or Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board, investigated in clinical studies for treating osteoarthritis, were included. Dextrose and drugs indicated for pain (irrespective of aetiology) or osteoarthritis were excluded. Titles and abstracts were screened using ASReview, full texts were assessed accordingly and results were classified per drug.

resultsFrom 26,638 deduplicated records, 201 articles reporting on 220 studies were included in this review: 104 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), including 9 post-hoc analyses, 75 cohort studies, 13 case-control studies, 12 cross-sectional studies, 12 pre-post studies and 4 non-randomised CTs. In total, 52 drugs were identified, with drugs originally indicated for osteoporosis being most frequently investigated. Short-term follow-up studies (< 1 year) were mostly RCTs focussing on symptom-modifying effects, whilst long-term follow-up studies (≥ 1 year) more often used existing data and assessed both symptom- and structure-modifying effects. The most frequently used outcomes were pain (118/220) and function (74/220) for symptoms and grading systems (28/220) for structural changes. Significant effects were observed in 40% of the primary outcomes related to symptoms and structure and in 78% of outcomes related to osteoarthritis incidence or joint replacement. For GLP agonists, antihistamines, coumarins, N-acetylcysteine, sex hormones and statins, however, a mix of disease-modifying and disease-aggravating effects was found.

conclusionsMany authorised drugs have been investigated in clinical studies to be repurposed for treating osteoarthritis, with short-term studies primarily examining symptom-modifying effects, and most long-term studies also assessing structure-modifying effects. However, the broad and heterogeneous nature of clinical research in this field complicates the accurate evaluation of disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug candidates. This review, therefore, highlights the need for a more strategic research landscape on drug repurposing for osteoarthritis.

Indexed as

Drug RepositioningOsteoarthritisHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID41619152
PMCPMC12963134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.