Observational studyBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2026
Efficacy and prognostic predictors of primary systemic therapy for de novo Stage IV breast cancer. Exploratory analysis of JCOG1017 PRIM-BC.
Observational study in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The optimal initial systemic therapy for de novo Stage IV breast cancer (BC) is critical, particularly to assess early drug efficacy. In the JCOG1017 trial, untreated de novo Stage IV BC patients received 3 months of subtype-based systemic therapy before randomization for primary tumor resection. Among 569 treated patients, the overall non-progression disease (non-PD: no 10% or more increase in maximum diameter) rate was 77.2%, and the objective response rate (ORR) was 29.0%. By subtype, non-PD/ORR rates were TN (78.2%/36.4%), Luminal (75.4%/13.4%), HER2 (92.9%/81.0%), and Luminal-HER2 (66.7%/40.3%). Multivariable analysis revealed higher non-PD rates in postmenopausal patients (odds ratio (OR) 1.673, p = 0.024) and those with PgR-positive tumors (OR 2.391, p = 0.0019). Endocrine therapy was more effective for patients with PgR-positive tumors (OR 3.258, p < 0.0001) and less practical in those with visceral metastasis (OR 0.605, p = 0.0334). HPD (Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, Docetaxel)/HPTX (Trastuzumab, Paclitaxel) therapies (non-PD rate: 92.7%) were highly effective for visceral metastasis (OR = 15.818, p = 0.0030). Patients without progression at 3 months had significantly better overall survival (HR 0.508, 95% CI [0.398, 0.648]). These findings emphasize that initial therapy must align with subtype, and endocrine monotherapy is suboptimal for ER + HER2 + BC. Effective strategies are needed for those with early progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.