ArticleInfectious diseases and therapy2026
Role of Cefiderocol in the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Nonfermenting Gram-Negative Bacilli (Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia) Infections: An Expert Statement.
Article in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficay of cefiderocol as salvage therapy in tricuspid endocarditis due to multidrug-resistantRevista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026Article
- ASP-COMPLEX: redefining antimicrobial stewardship to improve outcomes in high-risk patients with severe infections.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026Review
- Innovative Antibiotics: The Experience of Cefiderocol in Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Review
- Treatment of central nervous system infections caused byFrontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInfections caused by nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli (NF-GNB), particularly Acinetobacter baumannii, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, are associated with high morbidity and mortality, especially among critically ill or immunocompromised patients. The rise of multidrug resistance has rendered many first-line antibiotics ineffective, highlighting the need for novel agents such as cefiderocol, a siderophore cephalosporin with unique pharmacokinetics and broad in vitro activity against resistant gram-negative pathogens.
methodsA multidisciplinary panel of French experts in infectious diseases, microbiology, pharmacology, and intensive care reviewed the available evidence and clinical experience of cefiderocol. Using a structured consensus process, the group developed pragmatic, expert-based recommendations for its use against A. baumannii, S. maltophilia, and P. aeruginosa, considering clinical scenarios, resistance mechanisms, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) optimization, and practical implementation.
resultsCefiderocol demonstrates potent in vitro activity against NF-GNB, including colistin- and imipenem-resistant isolates. Clinical success, however, depends on optimized PK/PD exposure, particularly in high-inoculum infections or patients with augmented renal clearance. Cohort studies and meta-analyses suggest lower mortality and markedly reduced nephrotoxicity compared with colistin-based regimens in A. baumannii infections. For S. maltophilia, cefiderocol shows consistently low minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and serves as a reliable alternative to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or fluoroquinolones. Against P. aeruginosa, it retains high in vitro activity and should be considered after failure of newer β-lactams, with caution in New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM)-producing isolates. Continuous infusion and early therapeutic drug monitoring are encouraged to maximize efficacy.
conclusionsCefiderocol is a valuable therapeutic option for severe NF-GNB infections when conventional agents fail. Its use should be guided by pathogen-specific MICs and PK/PD-based dosing. The expert panel underscores the importance of early microbiological diagnosis, susceptibility testing, and optimized administration to achieve maximal clinical benefit while preserving cefiderocol's role within antimicrobial stewardship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.