ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2026
Patients as partners in a research advisory council role: describing the APERSU Patient Engagement Network.
Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) is crucial for developing patient-centered healthcare research and improving health outcomes. While patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) capture patients’ perspectives, meaningfully engaging patients in PROMs initiatives remains a challenge. This short report details the establishment and evolution of the Alberta PROMs and EQ-5D Research and Support Unit Patient Engagement Network (APERSU-PEN), a unique model designed to embed patient expertise and share practices throughout patient communities. Unlike many patient engagement groups focused on specific conditions, APERSU-PEN broadly integrates patient perspectives across the healthcare system. The network intentionally recruited experienced patient partners with advocacy and research backgrounds from targeted health and patient organizations. This approach enabled diverse representation and facilitated broad dissemination of PROMs awareness to various patient communities. This broad integration has most recently supported PROMs use in primary care. Key activities include the co-development of patient-friendly PROMs educational materials and active contributions sharing PROMs stories and experiences at various forums, supporting patient understanding and aiming to improve completion rates. The paper highlights challenges and their solutions, such as the broad scope of APERSU’s work, which was addressed by building this network. A critical success factor has been dedicated funding for the involvement of patients as partners, ensuring sustainable engagement and participation in external events. Flexible meeting options and cloud-based document sharing also accommodate busy schedules and geographical dispersion. APERSU-PEN exemplifies a transformative shift in healthcare culture and practice, where patients are recognized as “true end-users” of PROMs. This environment of mutual learning and respect between patients and researchers enhances the relevance and impact of PROMs. The model offers transferable guidance for other initiatives seeking to integrate PPIE meaningfully, ultimately increasing awareness of PROMs throughout patient communities. Future directions include evaluating member experiences and expanding diversity within the network to further strengthen patient engagement in PROMs and APERSU’s support services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.