Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41619063›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2026

Outcomes and cost of patient navigation in increasing colorectal cancer screening in a safety net hospital-based health center.

Florence K L Tangka, Sonja Hoover, Mark Krudy, Marjorie Locke, Jennifer Tran, Senkuta Riverson, Samantha Wasala, Tariku Mekonnen, April Vance, Sujha Subramanian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Florence K L TangkaCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0120-6401
Sonja HooverImplenomics, Dover DE, 8 The Green, Dover, DE, 19901, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6205-1212
Mark KrudyImplenomics, Dover DE, 8 The Green, Dover, DE, 19901, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-8664-5529
Marjorie LockeMedstar Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Jennifer TranMedstar Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Senkuta RiversonDC Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Samantha WasalaDC Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Tariku MekonnenDC Health, Washington, DC, USA.
April VanceCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sujha SubramanianImplenomics, Dover DE, 8 The Green, Dover, DE, 19901, USA. sujha.subramanian@implenomics.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2415-9721

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the screening outcomes and cost of patient navigation (PN) to improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake of stool-based tests and colonoscopies in a safety net setting.

methodsWe conducted a quantitative assessment of a PN program at MedStar, a nonprofit hospital system based in the Washington, DC area. We collected and analyzed data for the 2023 calendar year on sociodemographic characteristics of patients, screening test completion, barriers to screening, and the labor and non-labor costs of the PN program. The main outcome measures for this study included the number of patients navigated, overall screening uptake and follow-up procedure completion rates. We also calculated the cost of the PN program, the average cost per person navigated, and the cost per patient who completed a screening or follow-up procedure.

resultsMedStar's PN program navigated 1,287 patients, of whom 77.5% were reached and 43.5% completed screening or follow-up procedures. Another 20.9% of persons navigated were still in the process of completing screening or follow-up colonoscopies (e.g., awaiting appointments). The most common barriers reported were challenges related to bowel preparation (25.3%) and comorbidities (13.7%). The average cost per person to deliver navigation was $209.83, while the average cost per patient successfully navigated to complete procedures was $482.23.

conclusionPN is effective in increasing CRC screening and follow-up and this improvement can be achieved at a reasonable cost in safety net settings. Future research should investigate approaches to reach all patients referred for navigation and optimal approaches to address patient barriers.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerMass ScreeningPatient NavigationSafety-net ProvidersAgedColonoscopyDistrict of ColumbiaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedCancer screeningColorectal cancerHospital-based health centersPatient navigation

Identifiers

PMID41619063
PMCPMC12951285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.