ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2026
Outcomes and cost of patient navigation in increasing colorectal cancer screening in a safety net hospital-based health center.
Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo assess the screening outcomes and cost of patient navigation (PN) to improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake of stool-based tests and colonoscopies in a safety net setting.
methodsWe conducted a quantitative assessment of a PN program at MedStar, a nonprofit hospital system based in the Washington, DC area. We collected and analyzed data for the 2023 calendar year on sociodemographic characteristics of patients, screening test completion, barriers to screening, and the labor and non-labor costs of the PN program. The main outcome measures for this study included the number of patients navigated, overall screening uptake and follow-up procedure completion rates. We also calculated the cost of the PN program, the average cost per person navigated, and the cost per patient who completed a screening or follow-up procedure.
resultsMedStar's PN program navigated 1,287 patients, of whom 77.5% were reached and 43.5% completed screening or follow-up procedures. Another 20.9% of persons navigated were still in the process of completing screening or follow-up colonoscopies (e.g., awaiting appointments). The most common barriers reported were challenges related to bowel preparation (25.3%) and comorbidities (13.7%). The average cost per person to deliver navigation was $209.83, while the average cost per patient successfully navigated to complete procedures was $482.23.
conclusionPN is effective in increasing CRC screening and follow-up and this improvement can be achieved at a reasonable cost in safety net settings. Future research should investigate approaches to reach all patients referred for navigation and optimal approaches to address patient barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.