Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2026
Time-dependent microvascular and analgesic responses to cold compression in healthy adults: identifying the optimal cooling duration for recovery.
Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesBecause the ankle-foot complex is a frequent target of cryotherapy in sports medicine, establishing location-specific duration guidance has practical clinical relevance. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine how ankle-applied cold compression duration shapes microvascular perfusion at the foot dorsum, cold-induced vasodilation (CIVD), post-cooling hyperaemia, and analgesia, and to identify a pragmatic exposure window that maximizes vasoconstriction and pressure-pain threshold (PPT) while limiting CIVD/hyperaemia in healthy adults.
methodsProspective, randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial with a repeated-measures duration factor using an ankle-foot cuff. Sixty healthy volunteers were allocated 1:1 to Active cold compression (ACC; ~3 °C, 5-75 mmHg) or sham (shamCC; 20 °C, ~ 15 mmHg). Each participant completed four sessions (5, 10, 15, 20 min), order randomized with ≥ 7-day washouts. Primary outcomes were laser-Doppler perfusion indices at the foot dorsum; secondary outcome was PPT by algometry.
resultsMinimum perfusion (nadir) showed a strong duration effect and a condition×group interaction; ACC achieved lower perfusion than sham at 5, 10, 15, and 20 min (all p < 0.001), with progressive nadir reductions from 10→20 min in ACC (p ≤ 0.018). Time-to-nadir decreased with longer exposures (main effect p < 0.001). CIVD at the foot increased with duration and was higher in ACC at 15 min (p = 0.004) and 20 min (p < 0.001). Post-cooling hyperaemia (AUC) showed large effects for duration and group; between-group differences favored ACC at 0-15 min for all durations (all p ≤ 0.001), with stepwise increases from 5→20 min in ACC (all p < 0.001). Post-peak perfusion was greater with ACC at 10-20 min (all p < 0.001). At post-intervention PPT was higher with ACC at 5 min (p = 0.005), 10 min (p < 0.001), 15 min (p < 0.001), and 20 min (p < 0.001). Within ACC, 10, 15, and 20 min produced similar (and greater) PPT improvements, each exceeding 5 min (all p ≤ 0.001).
conclusionACC elicited dose-dependent vasoconstriction and robust hypoalgesia, with PPT improvements plateauing by 10 min. Because CIVD and post-cooling hyperaemia escalated at ≥ 15 min, a 10-minute ACC bout best balanced analgesia with vascular control, limiting disproportionate rebound perfusion and preserving a physiological equilibrium between vasoconstriction and vascular reopening; extending to 15 min can be reserved for cases needing marginal additional relief.
trial registrationISRCTN90040217; date: 25/05/2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41619034What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.