Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41619029›Full record

SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

The effects of aerobic and resistance training across eight cancer types: a systematic review.

Isaac Oppong, Roozbeh Naemi, Roger T Gossett

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Isometric Handgrip Training and Cardiovascular Risk Modulation: State of the Art.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Isaac OppongUniversity of Staffordshire, School of Health, Education, Policing and Science, College Rd, Stoke-on-Trent, ST4 2DE, United Kingdom. Isaac.oppong@research.staffs.ac.uk.
Roozbeh NaemiCentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Frederick Road Campus, Manchester, M6 6PU, United Kingdom.
Roger T GossettIndependent Researcher, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatients with cancer often experience declines in quality of life (QoL), functional capacity, psychosocial health, and body composition, alongside cancer-related fatigue. Aerobic and resistance exercise interventions have shown potential in mitigating these effects. This review evaluated the impact of such interventions on QoL, fatigue, body composition, functional capacity, and psychosocial health across both the commonly studied cancers such as breast, prostate, lung, and colorectal, as well as the less-studied types, including lymphoma, ovarian, multiple myeloma and head and neck cancers.

methodsSystematic searches were conducted across PubMed, Cochrane, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and EBSCOhost, identified 25 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from an initial 18,116 studies. The 25 RCTs were assessed using the TESTEX scale and PRISMA guidelines.

resultsAerobic and/or resistance training showed to provide beneficial improvements in a number of measures during and after cancer treatment across  cancer types. Qulity of life improved in 12 (of 13) trials that reported QoL. , There was a reported reduction in cancer-related fatigue in 9 (out of 10 ) studies that reported this measure. Significant enhancements in lean body mass and fat mass, were found in 6 of 8 trials that reported body composition. Functional capacity improved in 7 of 12 trials that reported this variable. Psychosocial outcomes showed mixed results, with significant improvements reported in 2 out of 7 trials that measured depression and anxiety. Moderate-intensity exercise, performed three times per week, demonstrated the most consistent benefits. Specific improvements from exercise were found in patients suffering from breast, prostate, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, colorectal, lung, and head and neck cancer. There was a notable lack of trials meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria that specifically focused on ovarian cancer patients.

conclusionStructured aerobic and resistance exercise showed to significantly improve QoL, fatigue, body composition, and functional capacity in cancer patients. Integrating tailored exercise into cancer rehabilitation can enhance recovery. Future trials should aim to standardise outcome measures and improve adherence across diverse cancer populations.

Indexed as

ExerciseNeoplasmsQuality of LifeResistance TrainingBody CompositionFatigueHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAerobicCancerResistance training

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.