ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2026
Comparison of real-world efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab or pembrolizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in a German population.
Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of Long-Term Survival Between Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab and Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab With Chemotherapy in Advanced NSCLC: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.JTO clinical and research reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), nivolumab plus ipilimumab with platinum-based chemotherapy (NIC) and pembrolizumab with platinum-based chemotherapy (PC) are commonly used treatment options. We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis comparing the two options under real-world conditions in Germany.
methodsWe collected data from patients whose treatment was initiated between July 2018 and June 2023. Primary endpoints were overall survival and safety. Categorical data were compared using the chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. Overall survival was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test.
results200 patients, 77 treated with NIC and 123 treated with PC, were included. Baseline characteristics were unbalanced with significantly more older, squamous, and PD-L1-negative cases in the NIC group. Median overall survival (OS) and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) were not significantly different in the NIC and PC groups (13.6 vs. 14.1 months / 5.8 vs. 6.2 months). Clinically significant adverse events (AEsi), related treatment discontinuations, and treatment-related deaths also did not differ significantly (p = 0.885/p = 1.000/p = 0.709). There were more immune-related AEsi in the NIC group (p = 0.001) and more chemo-related AEsi in the PC group (p < 0.001).
conclusionsNIC and PC seem to be equally supportable options in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Further analyses are needed to validate our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.