Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41618986›Full record

ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2026

Predicting suicide attempts in a high-risk clinical cohort of adolescents using machine-learning.

Christian Hertel, Noel Strahm, Stefan Lerch, Corinna Reichl, Julian Koenig, Marialuisa Cavelti, Michael Kaess

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christian HertelUniversity Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bolligenstrasse 111, 3000, Bern 60, Switzerland.
Noel StrahmUniversity Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bolligenstrasse 111, 3000, Bern 60, Switzerland.
Stefan LerchUniversity Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bolligenstrasse 111, 3000, Bern 60, Switzerland.
Corinna ReichlUniversity Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bolligenstrasse 111, 3000, Bern 60, Switzerland.
Julian KoenigFaculty of Medicine, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Marialuisa CaveltiUniversity Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bolligenstrasse 111, 3000, Bern 60, Switzerland.
Michael KaessUniversity Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bolligenstrasse 111, 3000, Bern 60, Switzerland. michael.kaess@upd.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While suicide prevention is a major global health priority in youth, it remains challenging to identify those at risk for future suicidal behavior. This study aimed to investigate the potential of machine learning (ML) based approaches to predict suicide attempts (SA) among high-risk adolescents. We applied three ML-algorithms – elastic net, random forest and extreme gradient boosting – to longitudinal clinical data, and compared their performance to a traditional statistical approach – logistic regression (LR). Models were trained using patient data from a clinical cohort (N = 255) of adolescents with self-harming and risk-taking behaviors. Forty-four predictor variables including sociodemographic information, features of suicidal thoughts and behaviors, psychiatric disorders, global functioning scores and adverse childhood events were obtained at baseline and selected to predict future SAs within a two-year follow-up period. Performance metrics included area under the curve (AUC), Brier score, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Moreover, individual predictor importance was explored. ML-algorithms outperformed LR in terms of overall predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.75–0.79 vs. 0.72) and model calibration (Brier scores = 0.18–0.20 vs. 0.24). A prior SA stood out as the most important predictor variable across all algorithms. Our findings demonstrate that SA can be predicted with good overall accuracy, even among patients with high prevalence of suicidal behaviors. The clinical utility of ML-based SA-predictions is subject to several limitations (e.g., ethical, legal, clinical). Alongside improvements of predictive performance, future research needs to address clinical and ethical implications of ML-based risk detection.

Indexed as

Machine LearningSuicide, AttemptedAdolescentBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMalePrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsRisk-TakingAdolescentClinical cohortMachine learningPredictionSuicide attempt

Identifiers

PMID41618986
PMCPMC13272205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.