Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41618914›Full record

ArticleAutism : the international journal of research and practice2026

Partner-dependent communication without dynamic adaptation in autism.

Saskia Bj Koch, Jordy van Langen, Jana Bašnáková, Arjen Stolk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Saskia Bj KochDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Center for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3628-6712
Jordy van LangenDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Medical Neuroscience Department, Radboud University Medical Center, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2504-2381
Jana BašnákováInstitute of Experimental Psychology, Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences SAS, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-2360-4291
Arjen StolkPsychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3798-4923

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autism is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by persistent communication challenges, often compounded by social anxiety. Although differences in perspective-taking, cognitive flexibility, and social motivation have been implicated in these challenges, their influence on live interpersonal interactions remains unclear. In this study, we quantitatively examined how autistic and non-autistic individuals with varying levels of social anxiety adapted their communication during experimentally controlled interactions with two ostensibly distinct partners-a child and an adult-both portrayed by the same role-blind confederate. Autistic participants were equally motivated and capable as non-autistic participants in adjusting their communication to stereotypical assumptions about a partner's abilities, spontaneously using greater emphasis when addressing the presumed less capable child. However, they were less likely to modify these stereotype-driven behaviors in response to interaction-based evidence of partners' equal competence. While non-autistic participants dynamically adapted their communication to treat both partners equivalently, autistic participants maintained their stereotype-driven adjustments throughout the interaction. Preregistered analyses further linked non-autistic individuals' adaptive responses to early social exposure, a developmental factor not observed in autistic participants. Together, these findings highlight a core interactional capacity, shaped by early social experiences and operating on interaction-based evidence, as central to understanding communication challenges in autism.Lay abstractEveryday communication can be challenging for autistic individuals, particularly when social anxiety is involved. Research suggests that differences in understanding and adapting to others may contribute to these challenges, but it remains unclear whether and how these differences affect real-time interactions. This study invited autistic and non-autistic participants with varying levels of social anxiety to interact online with two "partners." One partner was introduced as a child and the other as an adult, although in reality the same actor played both roles without knowing which role he was assigned. All participants initially emphasized their communication more with the presumed child, whom they assumed was less capable. Over time, however, non-autistic participants adapted their approach, treating both partners equally as they gathered evidence that the child was just as competent as the adult. In contrast, autistic participants continued to treat the child as less capable throughout the interaction. Moreover, non-autistic participants who adapted more quickly tended to have experienced greater early social exposure in daycare, a relationship that was not observed in autistic participants. These findings suggest that while autistic individuals are willing and able to adjust their communication based on initial assumptions about others, they are less likely to revise these adjustments in response to evidence of a partner's actual understanding during interaction, a skill that appears to develop differently for them from an early age.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAutistic DisorderCommunicationInterpersonal RelationsSocial InteractionAdolescentAdultCase-Control StudiesChildCognitive FlexibilityFemaleHumansMaleStereotypingYoung Adultaudience designsocial anxietysocial developmentsocial interactionstereotypes

Identifiers

PMID41618914
PMCPMC12923631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.