ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
ML Workflows for Screening Degradation-Relevant Properties of Forever Chemicals.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The environmental persistence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) necessitates new remediation technologies, yet the vast chemical space makes traditional exploration methods for understanding degradation-relevant properties intractable. Rational design of PFAS degradation strategies requires accurate prediction of three critical molecular properties: bond dissociation energies (BDEs) to govern kinetics, polarizability to control catalytic interactions, and thermodynamic stability to govern reaction feasibility. Guided by theoretically-rooted principles, we identify that global properties (polarizability, stability) require spatially-informed features (3D electron density patterns), while bond-specific properties are governed by topological features (atomic connectivity). We developed two distinct physics-informed ML workflows implementing this principle: For global properties, two-point spatial correlations were compressed via Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and input to a Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) model. For local properties, a graph-based feature scheme was coupled with a Random Forest (RF) algorithm. Both workflows demonstrated strong predictive performance (GPR R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.