ReviewClinical transplantation2026
A Scoping Review of the Photographic Assessment of Donor Liver Steatosis in Transplantation Using Artificial Intelligence.
Review in Clinical transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Scoping Review of the Photographic Assessment of Donor Liver Steatosis in Transplantation Using Artificial Intelligence.Clinical transplantation · 2026Review
- Shaping the Future of AI in Organ Transplantation: Position Paper of the European Society for Organ Transplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAccurate evaluation of liver steatosis and overall organ quality is critical for optimizing safe organ utilization in liver transplantation. Recent advances in computer vision offer promising tools to standardize and enhance this process. This review maps the current evidence on AI-enabled photographic evaluation of liver steatosis and identifies areas for future development.
methodsA scoping review of the literature, including searches of PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science, was conducted to identify studies published from inception to 27/03/2025 reporting on the development of AI-enabled tools for assessing liver organ quality from photographs taken during the donation process. A qualitative synthesis and critical review of the literature was conducted in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The review protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework (osf.io/zfcuk).
resultsAfter screening 219 citations, six studies from three independent research groups met the inclusion criteria. Sample sizes ranged from 40 to 192 donors. Five studies employed binary classification models using a 30% steatosis threshold, while one study reported a graded approach. Reported accuracies ranged from 0.81 to 0.92. Common challenges included small and imbalanced datasets with a dependence on supplementary donor data, such as blood tests and radiological findings. None of the studies conducted external validation. DISCUSSION: Current evidence is drawn from a small and methodologically heterogeneous literature. Publications from several independent groups nevertheless highlight growing interest in developing these tools. Future work should prioritize larger studies with robust external validation to strengthen their credibility and build trust in their clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.