ArticleThe Veterinary record2026
Randomised controlled trial finds no evidence that a synbiotic improves health in assistance dog puppies.
Article in The Veterinary record, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrebiotics and probiotics ('synbiotics' when combined) are purported to be effective in the treatment of diarrhoea and potentially other diseases. However, it is unclear whether preventive use early in life can affect health outcomes for puppies.
methodsA triple-blind randomised controlled trial was conducted to assess the effectiveness of a synbiotic in reducing the occurrence and severity of diarrhoea, gastrointestinal disease and atopy. The synbiotic contained Enterococcus faecium, fructo-oligosaccharides and gum arabic. Puppies were randomly allocated to one of two groups, one receiving the synbiotic and the other receiving a placebo from five to approximately 10 weeks of age. A further 116 puppies from 15 litters served as a non-operative control group. Faecal scores were recorded during supplementation, and the incidence of gastrointestinal disease and atopy later in life was assessed.
resultsFifty-seven litters (419 puppies) were given the synbiotic and 57 litters (412 puppies) were given a placebo. Attrition was minimal. The diarrhoea status did not differ significantly among the groups, nor did groups differ in incidence of gastrointestinal disease or atopy. LIMITATIONS: The non-operative control group was not randomly allocated. The effectiveness of only one type of synbiotic was investigated, and the effects were predominantly assessed for a relatively short period early in life.
conclusionNo benefits of administering this synbiotic early in life were observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.