ReviewPlant communications2026
Three-dimensional phenotyping: Technological advances and applications in genomics-assisted crop breeding.
Review in Plant communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating 3D phenotyping and functional-structural plant models for crop ideotype breeding.Nature communications · 2026Review
- An Effective YOLOv11 Grain Detection Model Trained on Intact Barley Spikes Reveals a QTL Containing a Pivotal Regulator of Lateral Spikelet Formation.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Research progress on cold tolerance key genes and mechanisms in four major northern China crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With rapid advancements in breeding technologies, phenomics, and artificial intelligence, crop breeding is progressively entering an era of greater precision and efficiency. In this context, three-dimensional (3D) phenotyping techniques-leveraging multidimensional spatial resolution capabilities-have overcome the limitations of two-dimensional (2D) phenotyping in breeding analyses, enabling precise characterization of crop spatial interactions, spatial distribution of plant architecture, and complex 3D structural traits. Recent breakthroughs in computer technology for 3D reconstruction and 3D segmentation have provided robust technical support for crop 3D phenotypic analysis. Furthermore, effective integration of extracted 3D phenotypic data with genotypic data serves as a powerful tool for future research on crop gene function and genomics-assisted breeding. This review systematically examines major advances in 3D phenotyping techniques and their representative applications, with particular emphasis on innovations in 3D phenotyping and analytical methodologies. In parallel, we describe the latest interdisciplinary advances in 3D phenotyping within crop functional genomics research and genomics-assisted breeding. We objectively evaluate the advantages and limitations of 3D phenotyping compared with 2D approaches to assist breeders in selecting appropriate technologies. Finally, we propose future perspectives to promote deeper integration of phenomics and breeding technologies. Despite existing conceptual and technical challenges, it is foreseeable that cross-disciplinary integration of phenomics and genomics will offer promising prospects for crop breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.