Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41618513›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026

Student Incivility and Its Management From a Nursing Academic's Perspective: A Scoping Review.

Yan Lee, Lin Zhao, Sonja Cleary

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yan LeeRoyal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4355-148X
Lin ZhaoRoyal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9734-6080
Sonja ClearyRoyal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5803-7816

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo examine published studies on nursing academics' experience with student incivility, explore their management strategies, and identify existing knowledge gaps.

designThis scoping review was guided by Arksey and O'Malley's five-stage framework. DATA SOURCES: Studies published between 2009 and June 2024 in English were retrieved from PubMed, CINAHL Complete, ProQuest, and Scopus.

methodsThe review included qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies on nursing academics' experiences or perceptions of student incivility and/or interventions to manage it in higher education. Data were analysed using descriptive methods.

resultsThirty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies mostly explored nursing academics' experiences (n = 18) or perceptions (n = 15) of student incivility. Of the eleven studies that investigated how academic staff address student incivility, nine were interventional studies and two qualitative studies explored academics' experiences.

conclusionThe prevalence of reported nursing student incivility is substantial in the literature, yet there is limited evidence on sustainable, targeted management strategies to address the issue and support nursing academics. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSIONAL: Further research is needed to evaluate the feasibility and long-term effectiveness of strategies and interventions aimed at reducing student incivility and to explore effective management strategies adopted by nursing academics across diverse cultural and online learning settings. It is critical to develop interventions that address the root causes of student nurse incivility and strengthen institutional support systems. IMPACT: This scoping review addresses gaps in the literature on managing nursing student incivility across diverse learning environments, providing evidence to inform the development of contextually appropriate strategies that support nursing academics in managing incivility effectively within evolving educational settings. REPORTING

methodThis review followed the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public involvement.

Indexed as

Faculty, NursingIncivilityStudents, NursingHumanshigher educationincivilitynursing academicnursing educationnursing facultynursing studentscoping reviewstudent incivilityuncivil behaviour

Identifiers

PMID41618513
PMCPMC13460989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.