ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026
What We Know-and Need to Know-About Nursing PhD Programs and Influences on the PhD-Faculty Pipeline: A Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo identify: (1) current evidence and gaps of PhD program components influencing PhD students' career outcomes; and (2) methods and tools used to assess the relationships between PhD program components and career outcomes.
designPRISMA scoping review.
methodsSearch terms included PhD nursing students, PhD education, PhD-prepared nurse, PhD in nursing, nursing faculty, and assistant professor. Studies empirically assessing PhD program components and career outcomes (e.g., desires, attitudes, actual employment) were included. Two researchers conducted screening, data extraction, and inductive content analysis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL in October 2025, without year and geographic location restrictions.
resultsThe search yielded 379 studies. After title, abstract, and full-text screening, 13 studies were included. Analysis resulted in 10 factors spanning four categories: program preparation, readiness and satisfaction, impressions of the faculty role, and program support.
conclusionExperiences in the PhD program likely influence students' desire to pursue academia. While this review synthesized influential factors, given significant gaps in the literature, there are likely more factors influencing student career desires. A more robust understanding of the factors during the PhD program which influence career outcomes is needed. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study did not include patient/public involvement in design, conduct, or reporting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.