Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41618435›Full record

ReviewStem cell research & therapy2026

Safety profile of autologous adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction in clinical use: an exhaustive literature review.

Caroline Nonnarath, Nicolas Serratrice

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Caroline NonnarathInstitut Marseille Rachis, Vert coteau Private Hospital, Marseille, France.
Nicolas SerratriceInstitut Marseille Rachis, Vert coteau Private Hospital, Marseille, France. nico.serratrice@orange.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adipose tissue-derived stromal vascular fraction (SVF) has rapidly emerged as a promising tool in regenerative medicine due to its accessibility, autologous origin, and potent reparative potential. However, despite encouraging preclinical outcomes, the clinical safety of SVF across organ systems remains insufficiently characterized. This comprehensive review synthesizes current evidence on the safety and tolerability of autologous SVF therapy in humans, organized by target organ systems including cardiovascular, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, musculoskeletal, cutaneous, neurological, and inflammatory applications. Across studies, SVF therapy appears technically feasible and generally well tolerated, with adverse events predominantly mild and procedure-related (e.g., transient pain, swelling, or local inflammation). Serious complications - including embolism, infection, fibrosis, or tumor formation - have not been reported to date in clinical settings. However, available studies suffer from major limitations: small and heterogeneous cohorts, non-randomized designs, variability in cell preparation and dosing, and short follow-up durations. The lack of standardized isolation protocols and absence of mechanistic endpoints further restrict interpretation. Overall, current data support the short-term safety of autologous SVF therapy, while underscoring the need for large-scale randomized controlled trials, harmonized methodologies, and long-term surveillance to fully establish its risk-benefit profile.

Indexed as

Adipose-derived cellsAdverse eventsAutologous therapyClinical translationComplicationsRegenerative medicineReviewSafetyStromal vascular fraction (SVF)

Identifiers

PMID41618435
PMCPMC12933908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.