ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2026
Impact of glycerol phenylbutyrate on biochemistry and outcomes in paediatric patients with urea cycle disorders: a multicentre case series from Saudi Arabia.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pre-emptive treatment in later-onset urea cycle disorders: a clinical perspective on glycerol phenylbutyrate.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUrea cycle disorders (UCDs) are rare inherited conditions that disrupt ammonia detoxification, leading to hyperammonaemia and potential neurological harm. In Saudi Arabia, high consanguinity rates increase UCD birth incidence. Traditional nitrogen scavengers - sodium benzoate (NaBz) and sodium phenylbutyrate (NaPBA) - are limited by poor palatability, high sodium burden, and large dosing volumes. Glycerol phenylbutyrate (GPB) offers improved pharmacological and practical properties, including slow intestinal hydrolysis, reduced dosing frequency, absence of sodium and propylene glycol, and better tolerability. This study assessed real-world outcomes of GPB in a paediatric UCD population.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 37 paediatric patients from three Saudi hospitals. Pre- and post-GPB data were compared for plasma ammonia, hyperammonaemic crises (HACs), HAC-related hospitalisations and durations, growth z-scores, and adverse events. A caregiver survey (n = 15) captured treatment experiences and preferences.
resultsGPB significantly reduced routine plasma ammonia levels by 21% (median 72 to 57 µmol/L, p = 0.011), with the proportion of patients above the local reference range dropping from 74% to 42%. Annualised HAC rates fell by 55% (2.2 to 1.0/year), HAC-related hospitalisations by 27% (1.1 to 0.8/year), and annualised HAC-related hospital stays by 24% (3.3 to 2.5 days/year), though these did not reach statistical significance. Growth z-scores showed small, non-significant upward trends (+ 0.2 for height and weight). GPB was well tolerated, with no treatment-related adverse events. All survey respondents (15/15) preferred GPB over NaBz and NaPBA. 100% rated GPB equal or superior in controlling ammonia levels and being easier to adhere to, and 85% found it equal or better for palatability.
conclusionsGPB improved biochemical control and showed consistent trends toward reduced clinical burden in a real-world paediatric UCD cohort. Although some outcomes were not statistically significant, likely due to sample size and inter-individual variability, the magnitude and direction of change - supported by unanimous patient preference - highlight GPB’s advantages. These findings support its use as a first-line or step-up therapy in paediatric UCDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.