ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026
SSVEP-based brain-computer interface enabling graded dyspnoea self-report: proof-of-concept study in healthy volunteers.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMechanically ventilated patients may experience respiratory suffering, which is difficult to assess when verbal communication is impaired. We evaluated the performance of a steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)-based brain-computer interface (BCI) designed to enable self-reporting of dyspnoea in this context.
methodsForty-nine healthy volunteers were studied under five respiratory conditions: normal breathing (NB), inspiratory resistive loading (IRL), inspiratory threshold loading (ITL), CO₂ inhalation (CO₂), and a return to NB as wash-out (NBWO). Respiratory discomfort was evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Two BCIs models were tested: a detection BCI (D-BCI), designed to discriminate between 'breathing is OK' and 'breathing is difficult', and a quantification BCI in the form of a LED-based analogue scale (LAS), composed of five light-emitting diodes. Visual stimuli were delivered at different frequency sets: 12-15 Hz, 15-20 Hz, and 20-30 Hz for the D-BCI; low frequencies (13-17-19-23-29 Hz) and high frequencies (41-43-47-53-59 Hz) for the LAS. Performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves; the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was the primary outcome.
resultsParticipants reported significant respiratory discomfort during IRL, ITL, and CO₂ conditions in the D-BCI groups, and during ITL and CO₂ in the LAS groups, as reflected by higher dyspnoea VAS scores compared to NB. The best-performing frequency sets were 20-30 Hz for the D-BCI (AUC 0.89 [0.89-0.90]) and low frequencies for the LAS (AUC 0.84 [0.83-0.85]).
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that an SSVEP-based BCI can sucessfully detect and quantify experimentally induced dyspnoea in healthy individuals. Further research is needed to evaluate its clinical applicability for assessing dyspnoea in non-communicative patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.