ArticleJournal of translational medicine2026
Machine learning-based clinical prediction model and multi-omics integration for assessing pancreatic cancer risk in new-onset diabetes.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Artificial intelligence-empowered, clinically-integrated multiomics research in thrombosis: a call to action.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGiven that pancreatic cancer (PC) is typically diagnosed at an advanced stage but is often preceded by new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM), providing a window for early detection, we sought to develop and validate an interpretable machine-learning model integrated with multi-omics profiling to identify early biomarkers of NODM-associated PC.
methodsIn a population-based cohort, individuals with NODM-associated PC and NODM without PC were identified and randomly divided (70:30) into training and validation sets after feature selection. Eight machine learning (ML) classifiers were compared using fivefold cross-validation, and model performance was evaluated in terms of discrimination, calibration, and decision curve–based clinical utility. We evaluated interpretability using the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analyses. Mechanistically, Olink proteomic profiling and metabolomics were analyzed through clinical classifications and model-defined risk strata.
resultsCategorical boosting achieved the best performance in the independent validation set (AUROC = 0.844). The NODM cohort was stratified into high- (n = 2,362) and low-risk (n = 5,030) groups, and internal validation together with SHAP analyses demonstrated consistent model performance and identified clinically interpretable predictors. Proteomic and metabolomic analyses under clinical and risk-based grouping identified 39 overlapping differentially expressed proteins and 145 overlapping metabolites with enriched across 11 shared KEGG pathways. Cross-platform validation highlighted PLTP, CRTAC1, and ITGAV as serum biomarkers with a strong potential for early NODM-PC detection.
conclusionsWe developed an interpretable ML framework centered on NODM enables practical risk stratification for early PC detection by multi-omics and provides a pathway of ML-based triage followed by biomarker confirmation for earlier detection and diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.