ArticleBMC psychology2026
Screen exposure in relation to cool and hot executive functions in preschoolers: parenting processes as mediators and parental growth mindset as moderator.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs digital media become pervasive in preschoolers' daily routines, a growing body of evidence links excessive screen exposure to poorer executive function (EF)-a key predictor of academic achievement and lifelong well‑being. However, the mechanisms through which screen exposure relates to cool (cognitive) versus hot (emotionally salient) EF remain insufficiently understood. To address this gap, the present study examines whether distinct parenting processes statistically mediate these relations and whether parental growth mindset moderates the resulting indirect pathways.
methodsWe recruited 299 Chinese preschoolers (M
resultsGreater screen exposure was related to poorer performance on both cool and hot EF tasks. An indirect pathway through parenting processes also emerged, with autonomy support and parental warmth serving as separate mediators. Specifically, autonomy support mediated the relation between screen exposure and cool EF, whereas parental warmth mediated the relation between screen exposure and hot EF. Parental growth mindset further moderated these indirect pathways: conditional indirect effect analyses showed that the mediation through autonomy support (for cool EF) and warmth (for hot EF) was statistically significant at medium and high levels of parental growth mindset, but not at low levels. This pattern suggests that the extent to which parenting processes statistically link screen exposure to children's EF varies as a function of parents' growth-oriented beliefs.
conclusionsHigher screen exposure was related to lower levels of preschoolers' EF, manifesting as difficulties in regulating cognition and emotion. The findings support differential indirect pathways, whereby autonomy support and warmth serve as distinct mediating processes for cool and hot EF, respectively, and these indirect relations are stronger when parents endorse more growth-oriented beliefs. These findings suggest that interventions may benefit from combining developmentally appropriate guidance for managing children's media use with efforts to strengthen autonomy-supportive and warm parenting practices and to cultivate parents' growth mindset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.