ReviewConflict and health2026
Innovative HIV care strategies and health system resilience in conflict-affected settings.
Review in Conflict and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Contraceptive and condom use among women from key populations in Myanmar.Harm reduction journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Armed conflict disrupts HIV care by damaging health infrastructure, displacing populations, interrupting supply chains, and increasing HIV transmission risks. This study examines structural barriers to HIV service delivery in conflict-affected settings and explores adaptive strategies to sustain care. A narrative review approach was used to provide evidence on innovative treatment and prevention models, mental health integration, and policy responses. Key findings show that governance collapse, ART stockouts, workforce shortages, and disrupted data systems undermine HIV care continuity. However, differentiated service delivery, mobile clinics, long-acting injectable ART, community-based models, digital tools, and trauma-informed approaches have shown effectiveness in fragile environments. Integrating mental health into HIV programs addresses the syndemic burden of conflict-related trauma and poor treatment outcomes. Strengthening health systems' resilience, improving donor coordination, and aligning humanitarian and HIV strategies are essential to ensuring uninterrupted care. Delivering HIV services in conflict zones requires flexible, context-specific, and rights-based approaches. A coordinated, multisectoral response is critical to close equity gaps and advance global HIV goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.