ArticleBMC nursing2026
A multi-tiered model of ethical challenges in nursing practice: a qualitative phenomenological study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNurses face multi-level ethical challenges in complex clinical environments. However, current research lacks a holistic analysis of the interacting factors. To address this gap, this study applies the Social-Ecological Theory to develop a comprehensive analytical model.
methodsThis study employed a qualitative phenomenological descriptive design. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 23 front-line nurses from six tertiary Grade A hospitals between December 2024 and February 2025. Data were analyzed using Colaizzi’s seven-step phenomenological method.
resultsA total of 23 nurses participated in the study. Three main themes that emerged from the analysis, encompassing a total of eight subthemes: (1) Macro-system challenges (policy, organizational, and cultural dimensions); (2) Meso-system challenges (nurse-physician, nurse-nurse, and nurse-patient relationships); and (3) Micro-system challenges (individual physiological and psychological factors, and professional competence). These subthemes were further detailed into 20 specific subcategories. Based on these findings, a three-tiered model was developed to conceptualize the multi-level nature of ethical challenges in nursing practice.
conclusionsThis study reveals the systemic nature of ethical challenges in nursing practice, which arise from the dynamic interplay of macro-institutional, meso-relational, and micro-individual factors. The developed multi-tiered model elucidates how structural deficiencies permeate professional relationships and become internalized as personal distress. These findings underscore the imperative for integrated, multi-level interventions that simultaneously address systemic policies, workplace culture, and individual competencies to mitigate moral distress and uphold ethical practice. Future research should test this model in diverse settings and evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.