ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2026
Do they practise what we teach? A mixed-methods investigation into learning transfer of the maternity team approach in maternity emergencies.
Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSimulation-based training is widely used to improve teamwork in maternity emergencies. However, evidence of learning transfer into clinical practice remains inconsistent. The Maternity Team Approach (MTA)—a structured framework comprising of leadership, role allocation, systematic assessment, and structured recaps—was introduced in a maternity emergency training program at a quaternary tertiary hospital in Australia. This study explored whether the MTA is applied during real-life maternity emergencies and barriers and enablers to its translation in clinical practice.
methodsA mixed-methods design involving focus groups, interviews, and live clinical observations. Sixty-two maternity clinicians (midwives, obstetricians, and students) participated in eight focus groups and four interviews. Clinical observations of fifty-four live maternity emergencies were conducted by trained raters using an MTA compliance tool. Qualitative data were analysed thematically and triangulated with observational findings.
resultsParticipants reported that while the MTA was perceived as useful and beneficial for coordination, communication, and patient experience,however, its application in practice was inconsistent. Structured recaps were most used, while explicit role allocation was less frequently observed. Five key themes influenced MTA uptake: leadership, team culture, team composition, nature of the emergency, and practice norms. Observational data confirmed partial application of MTA elements in clinical settings, particularly in emergencies involving large, unfamiliar, or ad hoc teams.
conclusionsDespite high perceived value of the MTA, learning transfer into clinical practice is variable and context dependent. Effective leadership, supportive culture, consistent team composition, and alignment between training and real-world conditions are critical enablers. To optimise transfer, maternity emergency training programs should incorporate contextually adaptive strategies and post-training support mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.