Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41618304›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2026

Terminal ulcers in end-of-life care: a scoping review.

Ilaria Saguatti, Romina Baldessarini, Dalia Caleffi, Domenico Cannizzaro, Paola Ferri

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ilaria SaguattiDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy. i.saguatti@unimore.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-4285-7352
Romina BaldessariniDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-7956-1244
Dalia CaleffiDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-8696-5447
Domenico CannizzaroDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6675-2788
Paola FerriDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7761-7226

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the final stage of life, the skin may fail, leading to the development of terminal ulcers. These ulcers are considered unavoidable, since they occur despite all pressure-relieving interventions being implemented and the best quality of care being provided. However, they are often misdiagnosed as pressure injuries, since healthcare professionals are not always adequately prepared for this topic. Thus, effective palliative care and palliative wound care is not provided and prevalence data is missed, despite it being considered a solid indicator of the quality of nursing care. Since the goals of palliative and standard care differ, failing to correctly identify the underlying cause of the ulcer may result in the skin injury being treated inappropriately, and the overall needs of the patient and their family not being accurately addressed. While palliative care settings are probably more accustomed to this type of assessment, recognising and accepting this situation could be more challenging in other clinical settings. The aim of this work is to summarise the current knowledge regarding terminal ulcers. Specifically, the researchers seek to provide a comprehensive overview of the concept of unavoidability, the terminology employed in relation to terminal ulcers, the diagnostic criteria and assessment tools, the prevention and management of such ulcers, their aetiology, and the understanding clinicians have regarding this topic.

methodsTo achieve this goal a scoping review was performed. Following Arksey and O’Malley’s framework and Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, we systematically searched the PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Embase, Google Scholar, ProQuest databases, up to March 2025, without time or methodological limitations. The review incorporated studies that explicitly referenced terminal injuries occurring at the end of life, written in English. The study encompasses all patients in all healthcare settings. A narrative synthesis was performed.

resultsTwenty-six studies were included in the analysis. The review summarises the huge amount of terminology applied to terminal ulcers and identifies multiple potential aetiologies. Diagnostic criteria were outlined, and considerations regarding the prevention, management, and professional education were discussed. The need for validation of assessment tools and clearer diagnostic criteria was highlighted.

conclusionsThis review maps current evidence on terminal ulcers and identifies significant gaps. Future research should focus on healthcare professionals’ training, communication skills, and the early recognition and prevention of these lesions to promote dignity in end-of-life care. Nurses are responsible for the proper identification and management of terminal wounds, which raises ethical concerns about the quality of care and the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence. Although correct identification may affect reimbursement, ensuring the best possible care and a dignified end-of-life process remains the priority.

trial registrationThe protocol was prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework (January 12, 2026 https//osf.io/d8xr2).

Indexed as

Terminal CareHumansPalliative CarePressure UlcerEnd-of-life careEnd-of-life woundPalliative carePalliative wound careScoping reviewSkin failureTerminal ulcer

Identifiers

PMID41618304
PMCPMC12930909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.