Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41618289›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Assessment of water, sanitation and hygiene interventions in primary schools: a case study of Uasin Gishu County, Kenya.

Gladys Chepkorir Seroney, Gugu Gladness Mchunu, Ng'wena A G Magak

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gladys Chepkorir SeroneyFaculty of Health Sciences, Durban University of Technology, P. O. Box 1334, Durban, 4001, South Africa. 22176505@dut4life.ac.za.
Gugu Gladness MchunuFaculty of Health Sciences, Durban University of Technology, P. O. Box 1334, Durban, 4001, South Africa.
Ng'wena A G MagakSchool of Medicine, Maseno University, P.O. Box 333-40105, Maseno, Kenya.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccess to safe water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) in schools is essential for children’s health, wellbeing and learning. However, data on school WASH in Kenya remain limited. This study aimed to assess the availability, functionality, and management of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions in primary schools in Uasin Gishu County to inform policy and practice.

methodsA mixed-methods case study was conducted in 51 proportionally sampled primary schools (24 rural, 27 urban) out of 498 in the county. Quantitative data were collected using structured questionnaires and observation checklists administered to head teachers or their representatives. Qualitative data were obtained through focus group discussions (FGDs) with teachers. Descriptive statistics were generated in R; qualitative data were thematically analyzed in NVivo.

resultsThe mean school population was 586 pupils. Sixty one percent of schools had access to piped water; 49% of schools relied on protected wells, and 24% of schools collected rainwater. Many schools used multiple water sources, so these percentages were not mutually exclusive. Seventy three percent of the schools lacked disability-friendly infrastructure for water supply access points. Median pupil toilet cubicles were 18 [IQR: 14–22]; 98% of schools had separate staff and pupil toilets. Two-thirds, 67% of schools reported availability of water for hand washing throughout the day, yet 59% of the schools lacked soap at hand washing points. Three-quarters, 75% of schools provided menstrual products. However, only 22% of schools had changing rooms and 25% of schools had sanitary disposal facilities. A WASH policy document was absent in 67% of the schools. Private schools generally showed better operation and maintenance indicators of WASH interventions than public schools.

conclusionsWASH interventions in the surveyed schools were inadequate and unevenly distributed, with notable gaps in disability inclusion, menstrual hygiene management and policy implementation. Strengthening routine water quality testing, upgrading sanitation infrastructure, ensuring soap availability, and implementing inclusive WASH and menstrual hygiene policies can significantly improve pupil health, reduce disease transmission, and promote equity in educational settings.

Indexed as

HygieneSanitationSchoolsWater SupplyChildFocus GroupsHumansKenyaSurveys and QuestionnairesHygieneInterventionsSanitationSchoolsWASHWater

Identifiers

PMID41618289
PMCPMC12933994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.