SynthesisBMC oral health2026
Evidence-based dental management strategies for individuals with congenital hemophilia: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeople with hemophilia commonly present with a range of bleeding symptoms, from minor oral cavity bleeds to life-threatening events such as intracranial hemorrhage. People with hemophilia often exhibit poor oral health, attributed to disease-specific barriers and a fear of dental procedures, which may exacerbate their oral disease burden. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the various dental procedures performed in patients with hemophilia and the corresponding clotting factor concentrate replacement regimens used for individuals with mild, moderate, and severe forms of the disease.
methodsAn electronic database search was carried out using MEDLINE by PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Web of Science, ProQuest, CINAHL, EBSCO Dental collection and EMBASE databases from inception to March 2025 for studies published in English language. The search strategy terms included were “hemophilia A”, “hemophilia A”, “hemophilia B”, “hemophilia B”, “dental care”, “oral surgery”, “complications”, “bleeding”. Case control studies, randomized controlled trials, observational studies and case reports addressing the dental treatments for people with hemophilia A/hemophilia B were included. Cases of acquired hemophilia and cases of hemophilia who are inhibitor positive were excluded.
resultsA total of 23 studies were included for the final review. Majority of the studies have ensured to achieve 30% to 50% factor correction for dental procedures. Routine dental care procedures like restoration and dental scaling with the necessary technical specifications can be safely performed. Dental extractions can be safely performed using local infiltration anesthesia; however, administering nerve blocks typically necessitates prior administration of clotting factors due to the elevated bleeding risk. Adjuvant systemic anti-fibrinolytics like Epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) and tranexamic acid greatly reduces the need for additional factor infusion.
conclusionsThe use of prophylactic clotting factors during dental interventions in hemophilia patients showed notable inconsistencies across studies. This inconsistency underscores the importance of conducting larger, prospective clinical studies to better understand the rationale behind clotting factor use and its effects on dental treatment outcomes in patients with varying degrees of hemophilia severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.