Trial reportBMC infectious diseases2026
Thereaputic efficacy of single dose Albendazole against Ascaris lumbricoides, prevalence of re-infection, and its associated factors among school children at Northwest Ethiopia: an open-label trial study.
Trial report in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite extensive implementation of albendazole (ALB) mass drug administration to reduce Ascaris lumbricoides among school childrens, it remains a major chilhood health concern which needs close monitoring of ALB efficacy. Additionally, ALB donot prevent re-infection, and determinat for re-infection needs investigation. Thus, the study aimed to evaluate an efficacy of ALB against A.lumbricoides, re-infection rate, and their risk factors among school age childern (SAC) at Northwest Ethiopia.
methodsAn open-label trial study was conducted at Chuahit Primary School from June to September 2023. A total of 415 SAC were recruited using convenient sampling techniques. Nearly 2 g of stool were collected and screened using direct wet-mount and Keto-katz (KK) techniques at baseline. Of these, 50 school children who tested positive for A. lumbricoides were treated with a single dose (400 mg) of ALB. A cure and egg reduction rates were evaluated within 2–3 weeks post-treatment using KK techinque. Addtionally, reinfection rate of A.lumbricoides was assessed 3 months after ALB treatment by formal-ether concentration techinque. Pre-tested, semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect sciodemographic, and risk factors of re-infection. Data were entered into Epi-data (version 4.6) and exported to STATA (version 14) for analysis. Descriptive statistics, paired t-tests, bivariate and multivariate logistic regression model were performed. A P-value < 0.05 with a 95% CI was considered as significant value.
resultIn this study, the cure and egg reduction rates of a single dose of ALB against A.lumbricoides were found to be 92.3% [95% CI: 87.5%–97.2%] and 96.7% [95% CI: 87.8%-100%], respectively. Of the 46 school children considered for assessing the re-infection rate, about 34.7% [21.8% − 47.6%] were found to have been re-infected. Poor latrine utilization [AOR = 5.52; 95% CI: 1.07–28.5, P = 0.004] and finger nail trimming practice [AOR = 0.064; 95% CI: 0.009–0.42, P = 0.041] were significantly associated with A. lumbricoides re-infection.
conclusionEfficacy of single-dose ALB (400 mg) was within WHO satisfactory level against A. lumbricoides although a high re-infection rate was observed in the study area. This underscores the importance of promoting proper hygiene practice like regular fingernail trimming and toilet utilization strategies, alongside sustained MDA campaigns with ALB (400 mg) to achieve disease elimination goals.
trial registrationThis trial is retrospectively registered at www.pactr.org (number PACTR202407793260730) on July 16, 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.