Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41618195›Full record

ReviewBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026

Rectal buttonhole tear during parturition: A case report and literature review.

Ye Tian, Lu Li

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ye TianCentral hospital affiliated to shandong first medical university, Jinan, Shandong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2835-4823
Lu LiCentral hospital affiliated to shandong first medical university, Jinan, Shandong, China. 413505122@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIsolated rectal tears with an intact sphincter lesion are an extremely rare clinical condition during parturition and are often referred to as a“buttonhole tear”.Currently, there is no established protocol for its management.The purpose of this study is to review the published literature of rectal buttonhole tears and describe a novel repair technique used in our case. CASE PRESENTATION: All relevant articles were reviewed, including only case reports and case series. Our search identified 21 reported cases, comprising 10 normal vaginal deliveries, 7 operative ventouse deliveries, 4 forceps deliveries, and 1 vaginal breech delivery. All cases had an uneventful recovery except 1. Most authors recommended multilayer closure to reduce the risk of wound dehiscence and fistula formation. In our case, a 23-year-old primigravida was admitted at 40+6 weeks of gestation. Her pregnancy was uncomplicated except for bacterial vaginosis. A healthy female newborn was delivered without complications. A rectovaginal examination revealed a rectal buttonhole tear with an intact anal sphincter. Following repair using a novel technique and postoperative management, the patient achieved an optimal recovery.

conclusionsRepair methods for rectal buttonhole tears vary. Given the rarity of this injury, the evidence base is limited. We propose a novel three-layer repair technique assisted by digital rectal support. Importantly, such lesions can be missed without a thorough post-delivery examination, potentially leading to delayed repair and long-term complications like rectovaginal fistula.

Indexed as

Anal CanalDelivery, ObstetricLacerationsObstetric Labor ComplicationsParturitionRectumFemaleHumansPregnancyYoung AdultDeliveryIsolated rectal tearLaborParturitionRectal buttonhole tearRectovaginal septum

Identifiers

PMID41618195
PMCPMC12952138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.