Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41618191›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

The effects of perceived chronic stress and work-related factors on the risk of incident depression among German general practice personnel: a causal pathway approach using IMPROVEjob study data.

Arezoo Bozorgmehr, Mona Ahmed, Julian Göbel, Benjamin Aretz, Birgitta Weltermann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Arezoo Bozorgmehr *Institute of General Practice and Family Practice, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, Bonn, 53127, Germany. Abozorgmehr@ukaachen.de.
Mona Ahmed *Institute of General Practice and Family Practice, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, Bonn, 53127, Germany.
Julian GöbelInstitute of General Practice and Family Practice, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, Bonn, 53127, Germany.
Benjamin AretzInstitute for Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology (IMBIE), University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Fed. Rep. Germany.
Birgitta WeltermannInstitute of General Practice and Family Practice, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, Bonn, 53127, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increasing workload faced by general practitioners (GPs) and practice assistants (PrAs) contributes to chronic stress and heightens the risk of depression. Various work-related factors, including work-privacy conflict (WPC), may further exacerbate this risk. This study explores the role of work-related factors, focusing on WPC, as mediators in the association between perceived chronic stress and the risk of incident depression among German GP practice personnel.

methodsThis study included 366 German GPs and PrAs using baseline and follow-up data from the IMPROVEjob trial. We assessed the risk of incident depression (Cut-off = 50) through changes in the World Health Organization Well-being Index (WHO-5) and measured perceived chronic stress using the Trier Inventory for the Assessment of Chronic Stress Screening Scale (TICS-SSCS). Work-related factors were evaluated, with a specific focus on WPC, using the corresponding scale from the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ III). A causal mediation analysis was performed to examine how work-related factors mediate the effect of perceived chronic stress on depression risk.

resultsIncreased perceived chronic stress was observed in 43.64% of participants, while 56.36% reported stable or decreased stress levels from baseline to follow-up. This increase in perceived chronic stress was associated with heightened reported work-privacy conflict (β = 8.99, p = 0.01), though higher baseline levels of work-privacy conflict appeared to mitigate this effect (β = -0.35, p < 0.001). Reported Work-privacy conflict increased for 43.22% of participants, remained stable for 28.39%, and decreased for another 28.39%. Moreover, heightened reported work-privacy conflict correlated with a greater risk of incident depression (logit β = 0.20, p = 0.015; OR = 1.02 per point, 1.22 per 10-point increase), with baseline conflict levels showing smaller subsequent increases (β = -0.35, p < 0.001), likely reflecting regression to the mean/ceiling effect. The risk of incident depression was identified in 19.49% of participants, while 80.51% did not develop depressive symptoms. Causal mediation analysis further revealed that work-privacy conflict partially mediate the relationship between chronic stress and the risk of incident depression, with both a direct effect ([Formula: see text] = 0.17, p = 0.002) and a mediation effect ([Formula: see text] = 0.03, p = 0.020) contributing to this association. Additionally, no significant associations were found between personal or work-related factors (e.g., age, gender, work time) and incident depression.

conclusionThis study emphasizes the need to address work-privacy conflict as a key factor in reducing the mental health burden associated by chronic stress among general practice personnel.

Indexed as

DepressionGeneral PracticeGeneral PractitionersOccupational StressStress, PsychologicalAdultChronic DiseaseFemaleGermanyHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsRole ConflictSubjective StressCopingFamily physicianGeneral practicesGermanyLeadershipPractice assistantPrimary care physicianSurveys and questionnaireWork commitmentWorkloadWorkplaceWork-related behavior

Identifiers

PMID41618191
PMCPMC12930637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.