ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Optimizing nitrogen fertilizer efficacy under narrow irrigation limit range: a synergistic approach to okra nutrient management.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optimizing water and nitrogen (N) management is critical for enhancing crop productivity under water scarcity. This study aimed to determine if a high irrigation upper limit can compensate for a low lower limit and whether optimal N application can mitigate the impacts of a wide irrigation range in okra. A pot experiment was conducted with three irrigation ranges (defined by the lower and upper limits of soil field capacity, FC) and two N rates: W1 (45-55% FC), W2 (35-65% FC), W3 (25-75% FC) and N1 (110 kg ha⁻1), N2 (220 kg ha⁻1). Results demonstrated that a high upper limit could not compensate for the adverse effects of a low lower limit. The narrow irrigation range (W1) consistently outperformed wider ranges, increasing yield by up to 42.3% compared to the wide irrigation range (W3). Moderate N application (N1) effectively alleviated the impacts associated with W3, boosting its yield by 24.9%, whereas excessive N (N2) was often detrimental. The optimal W1N1 combination synergistically enhanced system performance, achieving the highest yield (56.7% greater than the poorest N2W3 treatment), improving fruit quality (e.g., 11.5% higher soluble sugar), and increasing soil urease activity by 25.9%. Conversely, N2 led to soil acidification and nutrient imbalance. These results demonstrate that coupling a narrow irrigation limit range with moderate N is an optimal strategy for enhancing okra productivity and soil health, providing a viable guide for sustainable cultivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.