SynthesisThe journal of headache and pain2026
Effectiveness and safety of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in hemiplegic migraine: an individual patient quantitative analysis.
Synthesis in The journal of headache and pain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of erenumab on migraine aura frequency: a REFORM study.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Trial
- Hemiplegic migraine: genetics and pathophysiology.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP): Biology, Signaling, Pathophysiological Roles, and Therapeutic Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHemiplegic migraine (HM) is a rare and disabling subtype of migraine with aura characterized by reversible motor weakness. Preventive treatment remains challenging, as patients with HM are systematically excluded from RCTs. Monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway (anti-CGRP mAbs) have shown effectiveness in migraine with typical aura, but evidence in HM is limited.
methodsThis systematic review and quantitative synthesis followed PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for studies reporting patients with HM treated with anti-CGRP mAbs. Individual patient data were extracted, and pooled analyses were conducted for changes in monthly headache days (MHDs), days with aura, and Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score from baseline to three months. Risk of bias was assessed using the GRADE approach.
resultsSix studies (four case series and two case reports), including 13 patients, met the inclusion criteria. MHDs decreased from 18 (IQR 15–25) at baseline to 9 (IQR 3–20) at three months; however, the numerical decrease was not statistically significant (p = 0.077). Median monthly days with aura decreased from 3 (IQR 2–8) to 0.6 (IQR 0–2.3; p = 0.018), and the MIDAS score decreased from 88 (IQR 66–154) to 28 (IQR 5–74; p = 0.018). Ten patients (83%) achieved > 50% reduction in MHDs and aura frequency, and nine (75%) > 50% MIDAS reduction. No adverse events were reported.
conclusionsAlthough the overall evidence certainty is very low, anti-CGRP mAbs appear to reduce aura burden and migraine-related disability in HM with good tolerability, supporting the need for prospective multicenter studies and registries to confirm their effectiveness and safety in this rare, highly disabling condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.