ArticleBMC microbiology2026
A real-world evidence of sputum microbiota alterations and their association with oncogenomic changes and response to targeted therapies in patients with lung cancer.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAlterations to the respiratory microbiota may contribute to lung cancer progression. This study examined real-world data to characterize sputum microbiota alterations and to assess their association with oncogenomic changes and response to targeted therapies in patients with lung cancer.
methodA total of 724 patients with lung cancer who underwent etiological examinations of their sputum were retrospectively included. Tumor tissues of 105 patients were analyzed using commercial next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels targeting 1021 genes for the initial screening stage. Amplification-refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction was then used to assess the presence of EGFR mutations in 316 cases in the second stage.
resultsTP53 mutations were the most frequently observed coexisting mutations with microbial infections. In contrast, EGFR mutations were commonly found in patients without microbial infections. Tumor tissues of infected patients exhibited a significantly higher level of tumor mutation burden (TMB) and a greater frequency of copy number variations, especially on chromosome 11. Specifically, Klebsiella pneumoniae infection was more frequently associated with cases carrying TP53 mutations; while Candida albicans and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections were observed exclusively in cases with EGFR mutations. EGFR mutations without concurrent microbial infections were associated with a better objective response rate to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors and survival benefits in patients.
conclusionsWe demonstrated that opportunistic pathogens exhibited higher infection rates in patients with TP53-mutated, TMB-H, and non-EGFR-mutated tumors. Microbial infection in patients with EGFR mutations might be an influencing factor that weakens the therapeutic efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.