Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41618102›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2026

Emotional intelligence training improves stress regulation and performance in high-stress occupations.

Jemma B King, Yiqiong Li, Nicole A Gillespie, Neal M Ashkanasy

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jemma B King *School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia. uqjkin17@uq.edu.au.
Yiqiong Li *Business School, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Nicole A Gillespie *Melbourne Business School, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia.
Neal M Ashkanasy *Business School, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.

Funding

Australian Army DAR012/15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this randomized controlled study (N = 66) in an elite military setting, we compared stress regulation and performance outcomes between soldiers who received emotional intelligence (EI) training (n = 35) and those who received non-EI control training (n = 31). The EI-trained group underwent 15 h of instruction focused on recognizing, understanding, and regulating emotions. When exposed to intense simulated combat stressors, EI-trained participants showed significantly lower biological stress levels compared to controls and superior performance across multiple domains: shooting accuracy (94.1% vs. 51.6%, p < .001), memory retention for mission-critical details during stress serials (M = 5.15 vs. M = 3.10 items recalled, p < .001), increased speed and accuracy in complex mathematical calculations under pressure (56% vs. 19% correct, p < .001), and greater pain tolerance during cold water immersion (trainees persisted 72% longer, M = 50.94 vs. M = 29.08 min, p < .001). These findings highlight the potential of EI training to enhance stress regulation and cognitive and behavioral performance under pressure, offering valuable insights for improving employee well-being and avoiding burnout in high-stress environments.

Indexed as

Emotional IntelligenceMilitary PersonnelStress, PsychologicalAdultHumansMaleYoung AdultBiological markersCognitive performanceEmotional intelligence trainingHigh-risk occupationsPerformance under pressureStress

Identifiers

PMID41618102
PMCPMC12914035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.