ArticleOral and maxillofacial surgery2026
Feasibility of confocal laser endomicroscopy as an optical biopsy method for SCC on the auricle : an exploratory study.
Article in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploratory systematic characterization of vascular features in confocal laser endomicroscopy of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIn the resection of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (cSCC) of the auricle, the challenge lies in ensuring a safe excision with adequate surgical margins in an aesthetically and functionally sensitive area, while keeping the resulting defect as small as possible. To contribute to achieving this goal, the present study is the first to investigate the potential of confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) as a method of optical biopsy for cSCC.
methodsA total of 82 CLE sequences (from 7 patients) showing cSCC or healthy tissue were blinded and presented to four different investigators for evaluation; in addition, presence of individual malignancy criteria derived from the literature were assessed.
resultsThe distinction between healthy tissue and cSCC was achieved reliably. On average, the investigators reached a sensitivity of 96.95% and a specificity of 89.65%. A substantial interrater agreement was observed (Fleiss’ kappa 0.74). The malignancy criteria proved valid in this region, as all were significantly more frequent in sequences showing SCC (p < 0.001). The most sensitive single criterion was the “presence of large round cells with nuclear atypia”.
conclusionThe present study demonstrates the first feasibility of CLE as a tool for distinguishing between healthy tissue and tumor when defining tumor margins of cSCC on the auricle. Further studies are necessary to establish its clinical utility, including investigations into the application of evaluation scoring systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41618049What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.